Why T-rank?
Do you need to find the ultimate beneficial owners of your customers or suppliers? Do you need to understand who benefits from the profit of a company, or who calls the shots?
Complex ownership structures, with many levels and paths, cross- and circular ownership make it hard to understand who has the power and who has the cash rights. T-rank is the solution.
Who uses T-rank?
What do they use T-rank for?
They use T-rank to identify Beneficial owners, KYC in general, identification of related parties, risk assessment and much more. Most users have access to T-rank’s interactive shareholder maps application. A lot of customers also retrieve T-rank data through APIs and data feeds.
Applications
Ownership exploration
Understanding the ownership of your business clients is a fundamental part of KYC.
Beneficial owners
Identify the beneficial owners of your clients through API, data feed or interactively through shareholder maps.
Risk assessment
Use T-rank’s ownership indicators as input to risk assessment.
Our partners
T-rank services are sold by and delivered through our partners.
Moody’s
Moody’s is a major publisher of business information, and specialises in private company data combined with software for searching and analysing companies. Orbis is Moody’s flagship company database.
T-rank started to work with Bureau Van Dijk, which later became part of Moody’s, in 2014. The T-rank services delivered through Moody’s is based on Moody’s global shareholder data.
Tietoevry Data Services
As one of the largest IT companies in the Nordics, Tietoevry provides extensive deliveries to Nordic companies, financial institutions, national public sector entities, municipalities and health authorities.
T-rank has cooperated with Tietoevry since 2010. The T-rank services delivered through Tietoevry are based on shareholder data owned by Tietoevry and T-rank, covering Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Finland.
Latest posts
De Facto Control – Control with less than 50% ownership
Control is an important topic in relation to Anti Money Laundering, and most AML legislation addresses the topic of control. In certain situations, when someone owns significantly more than the other owners and there are many small shareholders, one should consider the largest owner as controlling even if they own less than 50%.
Read moreThe effect of BO definition deviations in Norwegian legislation
A challenge that came with the new register, is that the Beneficial Owners definition deviates from the Norwegian Anti Money Laundering legislation. This inconsistency reduces the value of the Beneficial Owners register as an information source in the AML work for obliged entities. This article illustrates the effect of the deviations.
Read more